https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=312 Numéros fr ven., 06 déc. 2024 10:03:29 +0100 ven., 13 déc. 2024 10:39:46 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=312 0 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=360 ven., 06 déc. 2024 17:28:39 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=360 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=364 ven., 06 déc. 2024 17:29:43 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=364 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=366 ven., 06 déc. 2024 17:30:58 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=366 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=314 O presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar duas obras poéticas com traços autobiográficos: Parabólicas (2018), de Pedro de Lucena, e Movement: performance poetry written down (2019), de Callum Brazzó. Ambas foram escritas por autores autistas e apresentam o corpo como arquivo de convergência de memórias. A análise baseia-se no conceito de autocorpografia, cunhado por Adelaine LaGuardia (2014). Tal conceito, oriundo do estudo de autobiografias de pessoas transexuais, revela a necessidade de desconstrução do corpo textualizado pela literatura médica para, assim, reescrevê-lo coletivamente sob outros signos. A fundamentação teórica para o desenvolvimento do trabalho transita entre os Estudos Literários, os Estudos da Deficiência e os Estudos Culturais. Como resultado, observa-se que a apropriação da escrita autocorpográfica por meio de um gênero literário às margens do mercado editorial (a poesia) oferece uma alternativa à ideia do autismo como auto isolamento. A partir da livre manifestação de demandas sensoriais do corpo autista na poesia, Lucena e Brazzó reescrevem o corpo autista como um corpo em constante movimento, inapreensível em sua plenitude pela linguagem. Este artículo pretende analizar dos obras poéticas con rasgos autobiográficos: Parabólicas (2018), de Pedro de Lucena, y Movement: performance poetry written down (2019), de Callum Brazzó. Ambas fueron escritas por autores autistas y presentan el cuerpo como un archivo donde confluyen los recuerdos. El análisis se basa en el concepto de autocorpografía, acuñado por Adelaine LaGuardia (2014). Este concepto, derivado del estudio de autobiografías de personas transexuales, revela la necesidad de deconstruir el cuerpo textualizado por la literatura médica para reescribirlo colectivamente bajo otros signos. La base teórica para el desarrollo del trabajo se mueve entre los Estudios Literarios, los Estudios sobre Discapacidad y los Estudios Culturales. Como resultado, se observó que la apropiación de la escritura autocorpográfica a través de un género literario al margen del mercado editorial (la poesía) ofrece una alternativa a la idea del autismo como autoaislamiento. A partir de la libre manifestación de las demandas sensoriales del cuerpo autista en la poesía, Lucena y Brazzó reescriben el cuerpo autista como un cuerpo en constante movimiento, inaprensible en su plenitud a través del lenguaje. This article aims to analyse two poetic works with autobiographical traits: Parabólicas (2018), by Pedro de Lucena, and Movement: Performance poetry written down (2019), by Callum Brazzó. Both were written by autistic authors and present the body as an archive where memories converge. The analysis is based on the concept of autocorpography created by Adelaine LaGuardia (2014). This concept, derived from the study of autobiographies of transgender people, reveals the need to deconstruct the body textualised by medical literature in order to rewrite it collectively under other signs. The theoretical basis of this work lies between literary studies, disability studies and cultural studies. It shows that the appropriation of autocorpographic writing through a literary genre on the fringes of the publishing market (poetry) offers an alternative to the idea of autism as self-isolation. Based on the free manifestation of sensory demands of the autistic body in poetry, Lucena and Brazzó rewrite the autistic body as a body in constant movement, elusive in its fullness by language. ven., 06 déc. 2024 10:49:53 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=314 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=322 Cet article vise à analyser deux œuvres poétiques aux traits autobiographiques : Parabólicas (2018), de Pedro de Lucena, et Movement: performance poetry written down (2019), de Callum Brazzó. Toutes deux ont été écrites par des auteurs autistes et présentent le corps comme une archive où convergent les mémoires. L’analyse est basée sur le concept d’autocorpographie créé par Adelaine LaGuardia (2014). Ce concept, issu de l’étude des autobiographies de personnes transgenres, révèle la nécessité de déconstruire le corps textualisé par la littérature médicale afin de le réécrire collectivement sous d’autres signes. La base théorique de ce travail se situe entre les études littéraires, les études sur le handicap et les études culturelles. Il montre que l’appropriation de l’écriture autocorpographique à travers un genre littéraire en marge du marché de l’édition (la poésie) offre une alternative à l’idée de l’autisme comme auto-isolement. À partir de la libre manifestation de demandes sensorielles du corps autiste dans la poésie, Lucena et Brazzó réécrivent le corps autiste comme un corps en mouvement constant, insaisissable dans sa plénitude par le langage. This article aims to analyse two poetic works with autobiographical traits: Parabólicas (2018), by Pedro de Lucena, and Movement: Performance poetry written down (2019), by Callum Brazzó. Both were written by autistic authors and present the body as an archive where memories converge. The analysis is based on the concept of autocorpography created by Adelaine LaGuardia (2014). This concept, derived from the study of autobiographies of transgender people, reveals the need to deconstruct the body textualised by medical literature in order to rewrite it collectively under other signs. The theoretical basis of this work lies between literary studies, disability studies and cultural studies. It shows that the appropriation of autocorpographic writing through a literary genre on the fringes of the publishing market (poetry) offers an alternative to the idea of autism as self-isolation. Based on the free manifestation of sensory demands of the autistic body in poetry, Lucena and Brazzó rewrite the autistic body as a body in constant movement, elusive in its fullness by language. ven., 06 déc. 2024 10:51:34 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=322 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=326 Este estudio buscó comprender el despliegue de las corporalidades y alianzas tejidas entre quienes participaron en la marcha de la discapacidad del 3 de diciembre de 2019 en la Región Metropolitana de Chile. Se realizó un análisis visual por medio de ocho fotografías seleccionadas y notas de trabajo de campo para la interpretación de elementos visuales y contextuales del fenómeno estudiado. Basados en los trabajos de Judith Butler sobre interdependencia y lucha política desarrollamos una propuesta sobre el movimiento de la discapacidad en Santiago de Chile como una lucha ensamblada e integradora de las denuncias de la revuelta social por una vida digna. Se identificaron tres categorías centrales desde el análisis: “Cuerpos ensamblados”, “Poner el cuerpo y cuidar el cuerpo”, y “Luchas por la vida digna desde la discapacidad”. La marcha de la discapacidad comparte repertorios de protesta con otros movimientos sociales confluyentes en el contexto de la revuelta social en Chile. También presenta elementos diferenciadores en la construcción y despliegue de corporalidades y ensamblajes cuerpo-cuerpo y cuerpo-objeto. Estos ensamblajes facilitan la participación de las personas con discapacidad en el espacio público y subvierten el imaginario de “objetos de cuidado”, relevando la condición ontológica de interdependencia de la humanidad. Este estudo buscou compreender o desdobramento das corporeidades e alianças tecidas entre aqueles que participaram da marcha da deficiência de 3 de dezembro de 2019 na Região Metropolitana do Chile. Foi realizada uma análise visual por meio de oito fotografias selecionadas e notas de trabalho de campo para a interpretação de elementos visuais e contextuais do fenômeno estudado. Com base no trabalho de Judith Butler sobre interdependência e luta política, desenvolvemos uma proposta sobre o movimento das pessoas com deficiência em Santiago do Chile como uma luta reunida e integrando as denúncias da revolta social por uma vida digna. A partir da análise, foram identificadas três categorias centrais: "Corpos reunidos", "Colocar o corpo e cuidar do corpo" e "Lutas por uma vida digna a partir da deficiência". A marcha da deficiência compartilha repertórios de protesto com outros movimentos sociais convergentes no contexto da revolta social no Chile. Ela também apresenta elementos diferenciadores na construção e implantação de corporeidades e montagens de corpo-corpo e corpo-objeto. Essas montagens facilitam a participação de pessoas com deficiência no espaço público e subvertem o imaginário de "objetos de cuidado", destacando a condição ontológica de interdependência da humanidade. This study aims to identify the deployment of corporalities and alliances woven between those who participated in the Disability March on 3 December 2019 in the metropolitan region of Chile. A visual analysis was carried out using eight selected photographs and field notes to interpret the visual and contextual elements of the phenomenon under study. Based on Judith Butler's work on interdependence and political struggle, we interpreted the disability movement in Santiago de Chile as a unifying and inclusive struggle based on demands for a dignified life at the heart of social revolt. We identified three categories central to the analysis: “Bodies assembled,” “Putting on the body and taking care of the body,” and “Struggles for a dignified life based on disability.” The march of people with disabilities shares repertoires of protest with other converging social movements in the context of social revolt in Chile. This study also presents differentiating elements in the construction and deployment of corporalities and body-body and body-object assemblages. These assemblages facilitate the participation of disabled people in public space and subvert the imaginary of “objects of care,” underlining the ontological condition of humanity's interdependence. ven., 06 déc. 2024 11:12:27 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=326 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=337 Cette étude vise à cerner le déploiement des corporalités et des alliances tissées entre ceux qui ont participé à la marche du handicap du 3 décembre 2019 dans la région métropolitaine du Chili. Une analyse visuelle a été réalisée au moyen de huit photographies sélectionnées et de notes de terrain pour l’interprétation des éléments visuels et contextuels du phénomène étudié. Sur la base des travaux de Judith Butler sur l’interdépendance et la lutte politique, nous avons interprété le mouvement des personnes handicapées à Santiago du Chili comme une lutte rassembleuse et intégratrice fondée sur les revendications pour une vie digne au coeur de la révolte sociale. Nous avons identifié trois catégories centrales pour l’analyse : « Corps assemblés », « Mettre le corps et prendre soin du corps », et « Luttes pour une vie digne à partir du handicap ». La marche des personnes handicapées partage des répertoires de protestation avec d’autres mouvements sociaux convergents dans le contexte de la révolte sociale au Chili. Cette étude présente également des éléments différenciateurs dans la construction et le déploiement de corporalités et d’assemblages corps-corps et corps-objet. Ces assemblages facilitent la participation des personnes handicapées dans l’espace public et subvertissent l’imaginaire des « objets de soins », en soulignant la condition ontologique de l’interdépendance de l’humanité. This study aims to identify the deployment of corporalities and alliances woven between those who participated in the Disability March on 3 December 2019 in the metropolitan region of Chile. A visual analysis was carried out using eight selected photographs and field notes to interpret the visual and contextual elements of the phenomenon under study. Based on Judith Butler's work on interdependence and political struggle, we interpreted the disability movement in Santiago de Chile as a unifying and inclusive struggle based on demands for a dignified life at the heart of social revolt. We identified three categories central to the analysis: “Bodies assembled,” “Putting on the body and taking care of the body,” and “Struggles for a dignified life based on disability.” The march of people with disabilities shares repertoires of protest with other converging social movements in the context of social revolt in Chile. This study also presents differentiating elements in the construction and deployment of corporalities and body-body and body-object assemblages. These assemblages facilitate the participation of disabled people in public space and subvert the imaginary of “objects of care,” underlining the ontological condition of humanity's interdependence. ven., 06 déc. 2024 11:18:53 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=337 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=341 Neste texto realizamos uma reflexão sobre as coproduções e as interseccionalidades das categorias “neurodiversidade” e “deficiência” na Academia e no Ativismo. Neste movimento, perguntamos como a categoria “neurodiversidade” está sendo pensada e materializada nas práticas de ativistas autistas, tendo como objetivo problematizar as concepções e reivindicações de direitos através da categoria ‘neurodiversidade’ que habilitem sua “antropofagia glocal”. A partir de uma revisão bibliográfica sobre o tema e da participação observante em pesquisas emancipatórias acadêmico-ativistas de autistas, buscamos conjugar um duplo movimento: tensionar críticas acadêmicas a partir de um movimento social de autistas; e tensionar críticas de ativistas globais a partir das articulações de um coletivo acadêmico-ativista no Brasil. Como contribuição ao debate, mostramos, na prática do coletivo, como o movimento ativista brasileiro aciona uma “identidade neurodiversa” como articuladora biopolítica de uma coletividade, ao mesmo tempo em que entende o autismo como “deficiência”, na chave do Modelo Social e dos Direitos Humanos, conceito que habita as principais legislações brasileiras sobre o tema. This paper analyses the co-production and intersectionality of the ‘neurodiversity’ and ‘disability’ categories in academic and activist circles. It reflects on how the category ‘neurodiversity’ is thought about and materialised in the practices of autistic activists, in order to problematise the conceptions and rights claims that enable its ‘glocal anthropophagy’. On the basis of a bibliographical review and observation-based participation in emancipatory academic-activist research on autistic people, the aim is twofold: to question academic critique on the basis of a social movement of autistic people; and to question global activist critique on the basis of the articulations of an academic-activist collective in Brazil. To contribute to the debate, the text shows that in the practice of the collective, the Brazilian activist movement puts forward a ‘neurodiverse identity’ as the biopolitical articulator of a collectivity, while understanding autism as a ‘disability’ in the key of the social model and human rights – a concept present in the primary Brazilian legislation on the subject. ven., 06 déc. 2024 12:32:09 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=341 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=345 Cet article propose une réflexion critique sur les tensions historiques et actuelles entre les savoirs dominants sur l’autisme et les savoirs autistes, mettant en lumière leur rapport à la neuronormativité. Une analyse des injustices épistémiques subies par les personnes et les communautés a/Autistes y est faite, démontrant comment les savoirs autistes sont souvent marginalisés et discrédités par les groupes dominants. Le concept de neurodiversité y est mobilisé pour illustrer et dénoncer le refus de ces groupes de reconnaître et d’utiliser les savoirs autistes, une attitude qui perpétue la stigmatisation et l’oppression des personnes et des communautés a/Autistes. Les phénomènes du double problème de l’empathie et du camouflage social sont quant à eux utilisés pour illustrer et critiquer la Neurodiversity Lite ainsi que l’instrumentalisation des ressources herméneutiques développées par les a/Autistes. L’article conclut sur une invitation à cultiver l’humilité épistémique et à adopter une posture engagée et militante, une posture d’auto-disempowerment, ou un croisement de ces postures, afin de rompre avec les pratiques sources d’injustices épistémiques ainsi qu’avec la Neurodiversity Lite. This article offers a critical reflection on the historical and current tensions between dominant knowledge about autism and autistic knowledge, highlighting their relationship to neuronormativity. It analyses the epistemic injustices suffered by autistic people and communities, demonstrating how autistic knowledge is often marginalised and discredited by dominant groups. The concept of neurodiversity is used to illustrate and denounce the refusal of these groups to recognise and use autistic knowledge, an attitude that perpetuates the stigmatisation and oppression of autistic people and communities. The phenomena of the dual problem of empathy and social camouflage are used to illustrate and criticise Neurodiversity Lite and the instrumentalisation of the hermeneutic resources developed by autistic people. The article concludes with an invitation to cultivate epistemic humility and to adopt a committed and militant posture, a posture of self-disempowerment, or a combination of these postures, in order to break with practices that are sources of epistemic injustice as well as with Neurodiversity Lite. ven., 06 déc. 2024 12:33:15 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=345 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=351 Dans les territoires français d’Outre-Mer, les inégalités sociales se doublent d’inégalités territoriales, accentuant le gradient social de santé et produisant une vulnérabilité particulière. Étudier l’influence de la situation post-coloniale en Guadeloupe sur les habitudes de vie des personnes dites handicapées suppose de rendre compte des « dominations enchâssées » à l’œuvre dans ces territoires. L’enquête DECIBEL-G (DEfiCience audItive : Besoins et Leviers en Guadeloupe) porte sur la population sourde et malentendante de l’archipel guadeloupéen, à partir d’un recueil mixte (questionnaires et entretiens), et en croisant les sources informatives (population-cible : personnes sourdes et malentendantes, et leur entourage ; professionnels-acteurs de la surdité et du handicap, sur le territoire). Les données portent notamment sur la participation sociale des personnes sourdes et malentendantes, et les freins environnementaux qui la limitent, en particulier dans le champ sanitaire. Les résultats s’inscrivent dans la lignée d’analyses socio-historiques des usages corporels et des mobilisations collectives de personnes en situation de handicap en Guadeloupe. Ils montrent un rapport ambivalent à la France hexagonale et aux personnes dites valides, entre quête d’assimilation et d’égalité face au manque d’accessibilité, et volonté d’émancipation par la revendication de spécificités culturelles et corporelles. Face au discours médical, le refus de la réparation coïncide, pour la communauté Sourde, avec des mécanismes de résistance à la domination, et de revendications identitaires. In the French overseas territories, social inequalities are compounded by territorial inequalities, accentuating the social gradient in health and producing particular vulnerability. Studying the influence of the post-colonial situation in Guadeloupe on the lifestyles of so-called disabled people requires an account of the ‘embedded dominations’ at work in these territories. The DECIBEL-G survey (DEfiCience audItive: Besoins et Leviers en Guadeloupe) focuses on the deaf and hard-of-hearing population of the Guadeloupe archipelago, using a mixed data collection method (questionnaires and interviews), and cross-referencing information sources (target population: deaf and hard-of-hearing people, and those around them; professionals-actors in the field of deafness and disability in the territory). The data relates in particular to the social participation of deaf and hard-of-hearing people, and the environmental obstacles that limit it, particularly in the health field. The results are in line with the socio-historical analyses of the bodily uses and collective mobilisations of people with disabilities in Guadeloupe. They show an ambivalent relationship with mainland France and the so-called able-bodied, between a quest for assimilation and equality in the face of a lack of accessibility, and a desire for emancipation through the assertion of cultural and bodily specificities. In the face of medical discourse, the refusal to make amends coincides, for the Deaf community, with mechanisms of resistance to domination and demands for identity. ven., 06 déc. 2024 12:33:55 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=351 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=368 En los territorios franceses de ultramar, las desigualdades sociales se ven agravadas por las desigualdades territoriales, lo que acentúa el gradiente social en materia de salud y produce una especial vulnerabilidad. Estudiar la influencia de la situación poscolonial de Guadalupe en los modos de vida de las personas denominadas discapacitadas significa tener en cuenta las "dominaciones arraigadas" que actúan en estos territorios. La encuesta DECIBEL-G (DEfiCience audItive: Besoins et Leviers en Guadeloupe) se centra en la población sorda y con dificultades auditivas del archipiélago de Guadalupe, utilizando un método mixto de recogida de datos (cuestionarios y entrevistas) y cruzando fuentes de información (población destinataria: personas sordas y con dificultades auditivas y sus familias; profesionales y agentes del ámbito de la sordera y la discapacidad en la región). Los datos se centran especialmente en la participación social de las personas sordas y con discapacidad auditiva, y en los obstáculos del entorno que la limitan, sobre todo en el ámbito sanitario. Los resultados concuerdan con los análisis sociohistóricos de los usos corporales y las movilizaciones colectivas de las personas con discapacidad en Guadalupe. Muestran una relación ambivalente con la Francia continental y los llamados "sin discapacidad", entre una búsqueda de asimilación e igualdad frente a la falta de accesibilidad, y un deseo de emancipación a través de la afirmación de las especificidades culturales y corporales. Para la comunidad sorda, la negativa a la reparación coincide con mecanismos de resistencia a la dominación y reivindicación de la identidad. In the French overseas territories, social inequalities are compounded by territorial inequalities, accentuating the social gradient in health and producing particular vulnerability. Studying the influence of the post-colonial situation in Guadeloupe on the lifestyles of so-called disabled people requires an account of the ‘embedded dominations’ at work in these territories. The DECIBEL-G survey (DEfiCience audItive: Besoins et Leviers en Guadeloupe) focuses on the deaf and hard-of-hearing population of the Guadeloupe archipelago, using a mixed data collection method (questionnaires and interviews), and cross-referencing information sources (target population: deaf and hard-of-hearing people, and those around them; professionals-actors in the field of deafness and disability in the territory). The data relates in particular to the social participation of deaf and hard-of-hearing people, and the environmental obstacles that limit it, particularly in the health field. The results are in line with the socio-historical analyses of the bodily uses and collective mobilisations of people with disabilities in Guadeloupe. They show an ambivalent relationship with mainland France and the so-called able-bodied, between a quest for assimilation and equality in the face of a lack of accessibility, and a desire for emancipation through the assertion of cultural and bodily specificities. In the face of medical discourse, the refusal to make amends coincides, for the Deaf community, with mechanisms of resistance to domination and demands for identity. sam., 07 déc. 2024 15:23:27 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=368 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=373 Este artigo propõe uma reflexão crítica sobre as tensões históricas e atuais entre os saberes dominantes sobre o autismo e os saberes autistas, destacando sua relação com a neuronormatividade. É feita uma análise das injustiças epistêmicas sofridas pelas pessoas e comunidades a/Autistas, demonstrando como os saberes autistas são frequentemente marginalizados e descreditados pelos grupos dominantes. O conceito de neurodiversidade é mobilizado para ilustrar e denunciar a recusa desses grupos em reconhecer e utilizar os saberes autistas, uma atitude que perpetua a estigmatização e a opressão das pessoas e comunidades a/Autistas. De forma semelhante, os fenômenos do duplo problema da empatia e do camuflagem social são utilizados para ilustrar e criticar a Neurodiversidade “Lite” e a instrumentalização dos recursos hermenêuticos desenvolvidos pelos a/Autistas. O artigo conclui com um convite para cultivar a humildade epistêmica e adotar uma postura engajada e militante, de auto-desempoderamento, ou uma combinação dessas posturas, para romper com as práticas que geram injustiças epistêmicas e com a Neurodiversidade “Lite”. This article offers a critical reflection on the historical and current tensions between dominant knowledge about autism and autistic knowledge, highlighting their relationship to neuronormativity. It analyses the epistemic injustices suffered by autistic people and communities, demonstrating how autistic knowledge is often marginalised and discredited by dominant groups. The concept of neurodiversity is used to illustrate and denounce the refusal of these groups to recognise and use autistic knowledge, an attitude that perpetuates the stigmatisation and oppression of autistic people and communities. The phenomena of the dual problem of empathy and social camouflage are used to illustrate and criticise Neurodiversity Lite and the instrumentalisation of the hermeneutic resources developed by autistic people. The article concludes with an invitation to cultivate epistemic humility and to adopt a committed and militant posture, a posture of self-disempowerment, or a combination of these postures, in order to break with practices that are sources of epistemic injustice as well as with Neurodiversity Lite. jeu., 12 déc. 2024 17:46:02 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=373 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=382 Este artículo propone una reflexión crítica sobre las tensiones históricas y actuales entre los conocimientos dominantes sobre el autismo y los conocimientos autistas, destacando su relación con la neuronormatividad. Analiza las injusticias epistémicas sufridas por las personas y comunidades a/Autistas, demostrando cómo el conocimiento autista es a menudo marginado y desacreditado por los grupos dominantes. Se moviliza el concepto de neurodiversidad para ilustrar y denunciar la negativa de estos grupos a reconocer y utilizar el conocimiento autista, actitud que perpetúa la estigmatización y opresión de las personas y comunidades autistas. Del mismo modo, los fenómenos del doble problema de la empatía y el camuflaje social se utilizan para ilustrar y criticar la Neurodiversity Lite y la instrumentalización de los recursos hermenéuticos desarrollados por las personas a/Autistas. El artículo concluye con una invitación a cultivar la humildad epistémica y adoptar una postura comprometida y militante de autoempoderamiento, o una combinación de estas posturas, para romper con las prácticas que generan injusticias epistémicas y con la Neurodiversity Lite. This article offers a critical reflection on the historical and current tensions between dominant knowledge about autism and autistic knowledge, highlighting their relationship to neuronormativity. It analyses the epistemic injustices suffered by autistic people and communities, demonstrating how autistic knowledge is often marginalised and discredited by dominant groups. The concept of neurodiversity is used to illustrate and denounce the refusal of these groups to recognise and use autistic knowledge, an attitude that perpetuates the stigmatisation and oppression of autistic people and communities. The phenomena of the dual problem of empathy and social camouflage are used to illustrate and criticise Neurodiversity Lite and the instrumentalisation of the hermeneutic resources developed by autistic people. The article concludes with an invitation to cultivate epistemic humility and to adopt a committed and militant posture, a posture of self-disempowerment, or a combination of these postures, in order to break with practices that are sources of epistemic injustice as well as with Neurodiversity Lite. jeu., 12 déc. 2024 17:47:13 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=382 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=384 Le présent travail analyse les coproductions et l’intersectionnalité des catégories « neurodiversité » et « handicap » dans les milieux universitaire et activiste. Il réfléchit à la manière dont est pensée et matérialisée la catégorie « neurodiversité » dans les pratiques des activistes autistes, afin de problématiser les conceptions et les revendications de droits qui permettent son « anthropophagie glocale ». Sur la base d’une révision bibliographique et d’une participation fondée sur l’observation à des recherches universitaire-activiste émancipatrices sur les personnes autistes, l’objectif est double : mettre en question la critique universitaire à partir d’un mouvement social de personnes autistes ; et mettre en question la critique activiste globale à partir des articulations d’un collectif universitaire-activiste au Brésil. Pour contribuer au débat, le texte montre que dans la pratique du collectif, le mouvement militant brésilien met en avant une « identité neurodiverse » en tant qu’articulateur biopolitique d’une collectivité, et ce, tout en comprenant l’autisme comme un « handicap » dans la clé du modèle social et des droits de l’homme – un concept présent dans les principales législations brésiliennes sur le sujet. This paper analyses the co-production and intersectionality of the ‘neurodiversity’ and ‘disability’ categories in academic and activist circles. It reflects on how the category ‘neurodiversity’ is thought about and materialised in the practices of autistic activists, in order to problematise the conceptions and rights claims that enable its ‘glocal anthropophagy’. On the basis of a bibliographical review and observation-based participation in emancipatory academic-activist research on autistic people, the aim is twofold: to question academic critique on the basis of a social movement of autistic people; and to question global activist critique on the basis of the articulations of an academic-activist collective in Brazil. To contribute to the debate, the text shows that in the practice of the collective, the Brazilian activist movement puts forward a ‘neurodiverse identity’ as the biopolitical articulator of a collectivity, while understanding autism as a ‘disability’ in the key of the social model and human rights – a concept present in the primary Brazilian legislation on the subject. jeu., 12 déc. 2024 17:48:57 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=384 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=386 En este texto reflexionamos sobre las coproducciones e interseccionalidades de las categorías "neurodiversidad" y "discapacidad" en la Academia y el Activismo. En este movimiento, nos preguntamos cómo la categoría "neurodiversidad" está siendo pensada y materializada en las prácticas de activistas autistas, con el objetivo de problematizar las concepciones y reivindicaciones de derechos a través de la categoría "neurodiversidad" que posibilitan su "antropofagia global". A partir de una revisión bibliográfica sobre el tema y de la participación observadora en investigaciones académico-activistas emancipadoras sobre autistas, buscamos combinar un doble movimiento: tensionar la crítica académica a partir de un movimiento social de autistas; y tensionar la crítica activista global a partir de las articulaciones de un colectivo académico-activista en Brasil. Como contribución al debate, mostramos, en la práctica del colectivo, cómo el movimiento activista brasileño activa una "identidad neurodiversa" como articuladora biopolítica de una colectividad, al mismo tiempo que entiende el autismo como una "discapacidad", en la clave del Modelo Social y de los Derechos Humanos, concepto que habita en la principal legislación brasileña sobre el tema. This paper analyses the co-production and intersectionality of the ‘neurodiversity’ and ‘disability’ categories in academic and activist circles. It reflects on how the category ‘neurodiversity’ is thought about and materialised in the practices of autistic activists, in order to problematise the conceptions and rights claims that enable its ‘glocal anthropophagy’. On the basis of a bibliographical review and observation-based participation in emancipatory academic-activist research on autistic people, the aim is twofold: to question academic critique on the basis of a social movement of autistic people; and to question global activist critique on the basis of the articulations of an academic-activist collective in Brazil. To contribute to the debate, the text shows that in the practice of the collective, the Brazilian activist movement puts forward a ‘neurodiverse identity’ as the biopolitical articulator of a collectivity, while understanding autism as a ‘disability’ in the key of the social model and human rights – a concept present in the primary Brazilian legislation on the subject. jeu., 12 déc. 2024 17:49:37 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=386 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=388 jeu., 12 déc. 2024 23:21:00 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=388 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=389 jeu., 12 déc. 2024 23:21:29 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=389 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=390 jeu., 12 déc. 2024 23:22:14 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=390 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=412 ven., 13 déc. 2024 10:29:55 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=412 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=420 Nos territórios ultramarinos franceses, as desigualdades sociais são agravadas pelas desigualdades territoriais, que acentuam o gradiente social em termos de saúde e produzem uma vulnerabilidade específica. Estudar a influência da situação pós-colonial em Guadalupe sobre os hábitos de vida das pessoas consideradas com deficiência significa levar em conta as "dominações arraigadas" em ação nesses territórios. A pesquisa DECIBEL-G (DEfiCience audItive: Besoins et Leviers en Guadeloupe) concentra-se na população surda e com deficiência auditiva do arquipélago de Guadalupe, usa uma metodologia de coleta de dados mista (questionários e entrevistas) e cruza fontes de informação (população-alvo: pessoas surdas e com deficiência auditiva e suas famílias; profissionais e atores no campo da surdez). Os dados referem-se, prioritariamente, à participação social de pessoas surdas e com deficiência auditiva e aos obstáculos limitantes que essas pessoas encontram, principalmente no campo da saúde. Os resultados são consistentes com as análises sócio-históricas dos usos do corpo e das mobilizações coletivas de pessoas com deficiência em Guadalupe. Além disso, mostram uma relação ambivalente com a França continental e as pessoas ditas "válidas", entre uma busca por assimilação e igualdade diante da falta de acessibilidade e de um desejo de emancipação por meio da afirmação de especificidades culturais e corporais. Diante do discurso médico, a recusa à ideia de "conserto" coincide, para a comunidade Surda, com mecanismos de resistência à dominação e reivindicações identitárias. In the French overseas territories, social inequalities are compounded by territorial inequalities, accentuating the social gradient in health and producing particular vulnerability. Studying the influence of the post-colonial situation in Guadeloupe on the lifestyles of so-called disabled people requires an account of the ‘embedded dominations’ at work in these territories. The DECIBEL-G survey (DEfiCience audItive: Besoins et Leviers en Guadeloupe) focuses on the deaf and hard-of-hearing population of the Guadeloupe archipelago, using a mixed data collection method (questionnaires and interviews), and cross-referencing information sources (target population: deaf and hard-of-hearing people, and those around them; professionals-actors in the field of deafness and disability in the territory). The data relates in particular to the social participation of deaf and hard-of-hearing people, and the environmental obstacles that limit it, particularly in the health field. The results are in line with the socio-historical analyses of the bodily uses and collective mobilisations of people with disabilities in Guadeloupe. They show an ambivalent relationship with mainland France and the so-called able-bodied, between a quest for assimilation and equality in the face of a lack of accessibility, and a desire for emancipation through the assertion of cultural and bodily specificities. In the face of medical discourse, the refusal to make amends coincides, for the Deaf community, with mechanisms of resistance to domination and demands for identity. jeu., 02 janv. 2025 22:37:20 +0100 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=420