https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=442 Entrées d’index fr 0 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=384 Le présent travail analyse les coproductions et l’intersectionnalité des catégories « neurodiversité » et « handicap » dans les milieux universitaire et activiste. Il réfléchit à la manière dont est pensée et matérialisée la catégorie « neurodiversité » dans les pratiques des activistes autistes, afin de problématiser les conceptions et les revendications de droits qui permettent son « anthropophagie glocale ». Sur la base d’une révision bibliographique et d’une participation fondée sur l’observation à des recherches universitaire-activiste émancipatrices sur les personnes autistes, l’objectif est double : mettre en question la critique universitaire à partir d’un mouvement social de personnes autistes ; et mettre en question la critique activiste globale à partir des articulations d’un collectif universitaire-activiste au Brésil. Pour contribuer au débat, le texte montre que dans la pratique du collectif, le mouvement militant brésilien met en avant une « identité neurodiverse » en tant qu’articulateur biopolitique d’une collectivité, et ce, tout en comprenant l’autisme comme un « handicap » dans la clé du modèle social et des droits de l’homme – un concept présent dans les principales législations brésiliennes sur le sujet. This paper analyses the co-production and intersectionality of the ‘neurodiversity’ and ‘disability’ categories in academic and activist circles. It reflects on how the category ‘neurodiversity’ is thought about and materialised in the practices of autistic activists, in order to problematise the conceptions and rights claims that enable its ‘glocal anthropophagy’. On the basis of a bibliographical review and observation-based participation in emancipatory academic-activist research on autistic people, the aim is twofold: to question academic critique on the basis of a social movement of autistic people; and to question global activist critique on the basis of the articulations of an academic-activist collective in Brazil. To contribute to the debate, the text shows that in the practice of the collective, the Brazilian activist movement puts forward a ‘neurodiverse identity’ as the biopolitical articulator of a collectivity, while understanding autism as a ‘disability’ in the key of the social model and human rights – a concept present in the primary Brazilian legislation on the subject. jeu., 12 déc. 2024 17:48:57 +0100 ven., 26 sept. 2025 10:15:00 +0200 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=384 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=386 En este texto reflexionamos sobre las coproducciones e interseccionalidades de las categorías "neurodiversidad" y "discapacidad" en la Academia y el Activismo. En este movimiento, nos preguntamos cómo la categoría "neurodiversidad" está siendo pensada y materializada en las prácticas de activistas autistas, con el objetivo de problematizar las concepciones y reivindicaciones de derechos a través de la categoría "neurodiversidad" que posibilitan su "antropofagia global". A partir de una revisión bibliográfica sobre el tema y de la participación observadora en investigaciones académico-activistas emancipadoras sobre autistas, buscamos combinar un doble movimiento: tensionar la crítica académica a partir de un movimiento social de autistas; y tensionar la crítica activista global a partir de las articulaciones de un colectivo académico-activista en Brasil. Como contribución al debate, mostramos, en la práctica del colectivo, cómo el movimiento activista brasileño activa una "identidad neurodiversa" como articuladora biopolítica de una colectividad, al mismo tiempo que entiende el autismo como una "discapacidad", en la clave del Modelo Social y de los Derechos Humanos, concepto que habita en la principal legislación brasileña sobre el tema. This paper analyses the co-production and intersectionality of the ‘neurodiversity’ and ‘disability’ categories in academic and activist circles. It reflects on how the category ‘neurodiversity’ is thought about and materialised in the practices of autistic activists, in order to problematise the conceptions and rights claims that enable its ‘glocal anthropophagy’. On the basis of a bibliographical review and observation-based participation in emancipatory academic-activist research on autistic people, the aim is twofold: to question academic critique on the basis of a social movement of autistic people; and to question global activist critique on the basis of the articulations of an academic-activist collective in Brazil. To contribute to the debate, the text shows that in the practice of the collective, the Brazilian activist movement puts forward a ‘neurodiverse identity’ as the biopolitical articulator of a collectivity, while understanding autism as a ‘disability’ in the key of the social model and human rights – a concept present in the primary Brazilian legislation on the subject. jeu., 12 déc. 2024 17:49:37 +0100 ven., 26 sept. 2025 10:13:34 +0200 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=386 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=341 Neste texto realizamos uma reflexão sobre as coproduções e as interseccionalidades das categorias “neurodiversidade” e “deficiência” na Academia e no Ativismo. Neste movimento, perguntamos como a categoria “neurodiversidade” está sendo pensada e materializada nas práticas de ativistas autistas, tendo como objetivo problematizar as concepções e reivindicações de direitos através da categoria ‘neurodiversidade’ que habilitem sua “antropofagia glocal”. A partir de uma revisão bibliográfica sobre o tema e da participação observante em pesquisas emancipatórias acadêmico-ativistas de autistas, buscamos conjugar um duplo movimento: tensionar críticas acadêmicas a partir de um movimento social de autistas; e tensionar críticas de ativistas globais a partir das articulações de um coletivo acadêmico-ativista no Brasil. Como contribuição ao debate, mostramos, na prática do coletivo, como o movimento ativista brasileiro aciona uma “identidade neurodiversa” como articuladora biopolítica de uma coletividade, ao mesmo tempo em que entende o autismo como “deficiência”, na chave do Modelo Social e dos Direitos Humanos, conceito que habita as principais legislações brasileiras sobre o tema. This paper analyses the co-production and intersectionality of the ‘neurodiversity’ and ‘disability’ categories in academic and activist circles. It reflects on how the category ‘neurodiversity’ is thought about and materialised in the practices of autistic activists, in order to problematise the conceptions and rights claims that enable its ‘glocal anthropophagy’. On the basis of a bibliographical review and observation-based participation in emancipatory academic-activist research on autistic people, the aim is twofold: to question academic critique on the basis of a social movement of autistic people; and to question global activist critique on the basis of the articulations of an academic-activist collective in Brazil. To contribute to the debate, the text shows that in the practice of the collective, the Brazilian activist movement puts forward a ‘neurodiverse identity’ as the biopolitical articulator of a collectivity, while understanding autism as a ‘disability’ in the key of the social model and human rights – a concept present in the primary Brazilian legislation on the subject. ven., 06 déc. 2024 12:32:09 +0100 ven., 26 sept. 2025 10:10:31 +0200 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=341 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=299 Ce texte discute des conceptions normatives qui voient l’autisme comme déficit et absence d’humanité en partant des questions posées par Mel Baggs, un‧e militant‧e autiste étasunien‧ne, dans des vidéos partagées sur les réseaux sociaux. En croisant son travail avec des travaux féministes, queer et des études critiques sur le handicap, nous analysons tout d’abord les relations entre les technologies du genre, de la race et de la sexualité avec les troubles mentaux, ainsi que le lien entre le diagnostic de l’autisme et le capitalisme contemporain. Nous mettons en évidence une description critique de la rationalité masculine, qui retrace les limites dans lesquelles l’individu moderne est conçu comme idéal régulateur dans la téléologie normative des théories psychologiques du développement et matérialisé par les institutions disciplinaires, en soulignant ses répercussions dans les discours et les pratiques autour de l’autisme. Nous passons en revue les controverses concernant l’indépendance dans l’articulation entre les technologies de l’écriture et les personnes autistes, en les opposant à la notion d’interdépendance élaborée par les études critiques sur le handicap. En conclusion, nous cherchons à faire entendre les affirmations contre-hégémoniques de la perception autistique, sur la base du travail politique de Mel Baggs, pour souligner l’aspect subversif du mouvement de la neurodiversité au sein des catégories médicales et psychologiques qui déshumanisent l’autisme. This text discusses normative conceptions that see autism as a deficit and absence of humanity, starting from questions posed by Mel Baggs, an American autistic activist, in videos shared on social networks. By intersecting her work with feminist, queer, and critical disability studies, we first analyse the relationships between technologies of gender, race, and sexuality with mental disorders, as well as the link between the diagnosis of autism and contemporary capitalism. We highlight a critical description of masculine rationality, tracing the limits within which the modern individual is conceived as a regulative ideal in the normative teleology of developmental psychological theories and materialised by disciplinary institutions, highlighting its repercussions in the discourses and practices around autism. We review the controversies concerning independence in the articulation between writing technologies and autistic people, contrasting them with the notion of interdependence developed by critical disability studies. In conclusion, we seek to give voice to the counter-hegemonic claims of autistic perception, based on the political work of Mel Baggs, in order to highlight the subversive aspect of the neurodiversity movement within the medical and psychological categories that dehumanise autism. mar., 09 janv. 2024 13:48:00 +0100 jeu., 25 sept. 2025 09:59:43 +0200 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=299 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=170 Este texto discute as concepções normativas do autismo como déficit e como ausência de humanidade acompanhando os questionamentos propostos por Mel Baggs, ativista autista estadunidense, em vídeos compartilhados em rede social pública. Aliando sua produção a um referencial feminista, queer e dos estudos críticos da deficiência, começamos investigando as relações entre as tecnologias do gênero, da raça e da sexualidade com os transtornos mentais, passando pela conexão entre o diagnóstico de autismo e o capitalismo contemporâneo. Damos destaque a uma descrição crítica da racionalidade masculina, que traça os limites dentro dos quais o indivíduo moderno é engendrado como ideal regulatório na teleologia normativa das teorias psicológicas do desenvolvimento e materializado pelas instituições disciplinares, enfatizando suas reverberações nos discursos e práticas em torno do autismo. Percorremos as controvérsias a respeito da independência na articulação entre as tecnologias da escrita e as pessoas autistas, contrapondo-a à noção de interdependência elaborada pelos estudos críticos da deficiência. Em conclusão, buscamos fazer ouvir afirmativas contra-hegemônicas da percepção autista, retornando principalmente ao trabalho político de Mel Baggs para ressaltar a subversão do movimento da neurodiversidade no interior das categorias médicas e psicológicas que desumanizam o autismo. This text discusses normative conceptions that see autism as a deficit and absence of humanity, starting from questions posed by Mel Baggs, an American autistic activist, in videos shared on social networks. By intersecting her work with feminist, queer, and critical disability studies, we first analyse the relationships between technologies of gender, race, and sexuality with mental disorders, as well as the link between the diagnosis of autism and contemporary capitalism. We highlight a critical description of masculine rationality, tracing the limits within which the modern individual is conceived as a regulative ideal in the normative teleology of developmental psychological theories and materialised by disciplinary institutions, highlighting its repercussions in the discourses and practices around autism. We review the controversies concerning independence in the articulation between writing technologies and autistic people, contrasting them with the notion of interdependence developed by critical disability studies. In conclusion, we seek to give voice to the counter-hegemonic claims of autistic perception, based on the political work of Mel Baggs, in order to highlight the subversive aspect of the neurodiversity movement within the medical and psychological categories that dehumanise autism. Este texto discute las concepciones normativas del autismo como déficit y como ausencia de humanidad, siguiendo los aportes propuestos por Mel Baggs, activista autista estadounidense, en vídeos compartidos en una red social pública. Combinando su trabajo con un marco feminista, queer y de estudios críticos sobre discapacidad, comenzamos investigando la relación entre las tecnologías de género, raza y sexualidad y los trastornos mentales, y la conexión entre el diagnóstico de autismo y el capitalismo contemporáneo. Destacamos una descripción crítica de la racionalidad masculina, que rastrea los límites dentro de los cuales el individuo moderno es engendrado como ideal regulador en la teleología normativa de las teorías psicológicas del desarrollo y materializado por las instituciones disciplinarias, haciendo hincapié en sus ecos en los discursos y prácticas en torno al autismo. Recorremos las controversias en torno a la independencia en la articulación entre las tecnologías de la escritura y los autistas, contrastándola con la noción de interdependencia elaborada por los estudios críticos de la discapacidad. En conclusión, buscamos hacer oír afirmaciones contrahegemónicas de la percepción autista, retomando principalmente el trabajo político de Mel Baggs para destacar la subversión del movimiento de la neurodiversidad dentro de las categorías médicas y psicológicas que deshumanizan el autismo. lun., 11 déc. 2023 12:16:55 +0100 jeu., 25 sept. 2025 09:58:10 +0200 https://lodelpreprod.univ-rennes2.fr/cfla/index.php?id=170